AI automation for law firms
Case-based precedent research
Secretary researches court decisions using your case documents and prepares a source-based note comparing favourable and adverse findings.
Research starts with the facts, claims and legal issues in the file. Secretary reads the supported documents it can access and derives research questions and search terms from that material. The lawyer does not need to turn the entire case into a separate search prompt before the work can begin.
Decisions are considered in the context of the case
Secretary searches the Ministry of Justice decision service and examines the decisions it reaches. It compares their facts and reasoning with the case, considers the side represented and explains both favourable and adverse findings. Decisions already cited in the case documents are also researched so their reasoning can be compared with the claim made about them.
What the research note contains
- The legal issues identified in the case and the questions investigated.
- Relevant decisions, their case references and quotations from their reasoning.
- Similarities, differences and points that may support or challenge the represented side.
- The full decision texts reached during the research, alongside the Word research note.
A working document for the next stage
The research note is saved with the case so the team can assess the findings against the source decisions. An existing note can also inform a petition draft for that same case. When new case documents arrive, later research can take them into account while reusing available readings of unchanged documents.
Research results depend on the documents and decisions available. The note supports legal assessment; it does not establish that every relevant decision has been found. The lawyer reviews the sources, missing information and applicability of the findings before relying on them.